Using LinkedIn Responsibly: References and Avatars

We all have a LinkedIn profile, right? With over 150 million members, and growing at the rate of two new users per second, it’s hard to imagine anyone not being on LinkedIn. It’s a great place to share your professional accomplishments.  And, it’s a good place to be seen by recruiters.  But sadly, I’ve also seen articles cautioning LinkedIn users about references and photos or avatars.

Until now, I’ve never thought twice about either of these matters.  I mean, why wouldn’t you put your photo on LinkedIn?  It helps you connect with people.  And, references…well, you shouldn’t put stuff out there that isn’t true…so I assume any recommendation you write is the truth.  And, the truth can’t get you into trouble…right?

But maybe I need to change my story…so to give me the real deal on this, I reached out to one of my favorite labor lawyers, Eric B. Meyer with the firm Dilworth Paxson LLP and author of the blog The Employer Handbook, to get another perspective on LinkedIn:

Question #1 deals with the neutral reference.  Here’s the scenario:  My company has a neutral reference policy, meaning we only release name-title-dates of employment.  That’s it.  Meanwhile, employees all over the company have LinkedIn accounts…which of course, list my company as the current employer.

Me and my co-worker (let’s call him Bob) give each other recommendations on LinkedIn.  Bob’s a nice guy and I always enjoy working with him.  Then Bob gets himself fired.  Can I get into trouble for writing him a reference on LinkedIn?

ERIC:  It depends. Although it may differ some in form, in substance, a LinkedIn recommendation can be very similar to a classic written recommendation.

There may be some benefit to an employer -- in terms of exposure and marketability -- to have its current employees receiving positive recommendations on LinkedIn.

There are also reasons why employers prefer neutral references.

For example, a positive reference could come back to bite an employer if the recommended employee is terminated and he/she later sues for discrimination. That is, while the employer may contend that it was perfectly justified in terminating the employee, the employee may use the LinkedIn recommendation as evidence that the employer’s reason for termination was mere “pretext” for some discriminatory motive in ending the employment relationship.

Under the “Bob scenario,” describing Bob as a nice guy -- while a positive reference -- doesn’t necessarily suggest that Bob is a good employee. On the other hand, we enter a gray area with a LinkedIn recommendation that describes Bob as someone with whom you enjoy working. Certainly, a LinkedIn recommendation listing Bob’s work achievements and otherwise praising his performance as an employee of the company would run afoul of the neutral reference policy.

As a best practice, before giving Bob any kind of written recommendation, you should ascertain whether your company has a neutral reference policy. Then do a “belt and suspenders.” Discuss with a manager, and/or Human Resources, your specific proposed LinkedIn recommendation for Bob. Get the OK from your employer first. Then give the LinkedIn recommendation.

Question #2 addresses photos versus icons.  I’ve been reading a lot about how I should replace my photo with some sort of icon so recruiters don’t know what I look like.  The point being:  if you don’t know what I look like then you can’t discriminate against me.

Isn’t this a bit “over the top”?  Recruiters will eventually see what you look like, right?  What’s your take?

ERIC:  This seems excessive. In order to prove discrimination, a victim must establish that he/she was discriminated against on the basis of his/her protected status (e.g., race, gender, religion, national origin, etc.).

If a recruiter does not obtain demographic information directly from the potential hire, it is still possible that the recruiter will eventually “stumble upon” this information and see what you look like. That is, a recruiter is likely to Google you, and then check you out on social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and MySpace.

In these cases, the potential hire may have a difficult time establishing discrimination. Not only would the potential hire have to show that a decision not to hire was made based on demographic information, but also that the recruiter, in fact, obtained this information.

So rather than worry about a potential discrimination action, where appropriate, take advantage of the opportunity to include a quality photograph to set yourself apart from the competition.

Let me add that companies might want to start including information about LinkedIn recommendations in their general communication about company references.  Why wait for someone to come and ask?  Be proactive.

And, I think Eric’s point about avatars is spot on.  A good photo can really set you apart.  So take a objective look at yours and ask yourself: "Would I connect with me?"

Thanks Eric for your sage advice (as usual!)  I owe you one in Atlanta at SHRM Annual.

 

The SHRM Blog does not accept solicitation for guest posts.
COMMENTS 1

Comments

Sharlyn - I'm glad Eric came out on the side of including a photo. An important statistic: LinkedIn says you are seven times more likely to have someone click through to view your profile (when you come up in LinkedIn search results) if you include a photo of you. Random icons and images of pets don't help humanize your profile. If you are a "shadow face" -- no photo at all -- LinkedIn does not consider your profile 100% complete, so you may not be found as often as you should in LinkedIn searches.

Take the time to have a professional picture taken. Smile, look friendly! Avoid distracting backgrounds, excessive jewelry and animal prints! Post it on LinkedIn, allow "everyone" to view it and worry about something else!

Add new comment

Please enter the text you see in the image below:
Image CAPTCHA